Follow Your Dreams; Be Organized

Normally I find inspirational quotes corny, especially when they’re posted on walls.  We in education are the worst offenders, specifically raising the sorts of dead-serious, soul-crushing mantras that make you want to duck out of fourth period Life Science to go vomit:

  • “Shoot for the Stars!”
  • “Hard Work + Determination = The Road to Success!”

The most cringe-worthy I ever saw was:

  • “The Elevator to Success is broken.  You’ll have to take the stairs — one step at a time.”

This was back in Washington, D.C. — home of a remarkably dysfunctional school system — and I always imagined the poster should read:

  • “Unfortunately this is the D.C. Public School system — the stairs are also broken.  We regret to inform you that there is *no* route to success at the present time.  We apologize for the inconvenience.”

But years ago, I did see a poster in someone’s house that I actually liked.  Perhaps its subtle mockery of the whole saccharine-sweet genre appealed to me.  Or maybe it just made sense:

  • “Follow your dreams; be organized.”

Now I always had a handle on the first part of the quote.  Follow your dreams — much easier than trying to follow someone else’s, I’ve found.  But I was never much good at the “be organized part” until a few years ago, when I became what I like to call “a veteran teacher.” By that I mean “someone who is no longer having chalk and / or pencil sharpeners thrown at him” — or “who has at least learned how to duck effectively.” I am joking!  But while I was staggering through those first few years in the classroom, wondering “is it too late to go into something more relaxing — like maybe shark tank cleaning?” — I was starting to understand the importance of being organized.  It was a really important revelation for me as a young teacher, right up there with “don’t ever argue with an eighth grader,” or “middle school lunch duty causes something important inside you to break,” or “also you should probably never argue with anyone whose developmental state involves dating a girl who is not aware that you are dating.” Learning about the importance of being organized was a milestone in my life, which is why it’s too bad that I’ve now taken it too far.

But let me back up.  First of all, the fact that I’d ever become organized in the first place was an outrageous long shot, along the lines of Donald Trump winning the presidency despite doing a better job trying to shoot himself in the foot than anyone since Plaxico Burress.

For most of my life I was an unrepentant slob.  I had the sort of room that people would walk into and say, “You don’t have a girlfriend, do you?” In my early twenties I rented a house with three other kayakers.  The upstairs bathroom, which I shared with my friend Jack, was particularly vile, largely stemming from how often we took notice (“once in a while”) and from our rigorous cleaning schedule (“once in a never).  At one point during this era I specifically recall visiting the bathrooms at both Mad River Glen and Fenway Park and thinking to myself, “I don’t see what the fuss is.  These are fine.”

Then there was my car: a singular mix of snack debris, wet kayaking gear, and the type of odors that cause murderous hitchhikers to say, “You know what?  I’ll wait for next car, thanks.” Of course the people who rode in my car the most — other kayakers — didn’t care a whit.  All they cared about was getting a ride back to the put in so they could hop in their own car — which probably made mine smell like new floral arrangements.

Right around when I traded the paddle for the red pen and started teaching — and started dating women whose main aspiration did not include getting a drysuit sponsor — I visited a place I had never been to before.  It was called the car wash.  They had a vacuum that you could use to slurp up the cracker crumbs that were older than Strom Thurmond residing in your seat cushions.  I also began to realize certain truths — little things like:

“If you don’t leave decaying river booties in your car, there won’t always be a three-space vacancy on either side in the parking lot.”

It was a heady time.

And you know what else helped me start to quite literally “clean up” my act?  A book!  I’ve always been a reader, dating back to the time before I could actually read, but would just pretend (I believe I read all about Ronald Reagan’s thumping of Walter Mondale in this fashion).  Now you’d think it was a book about being organized that finally changed me.  Something like:

  • The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up
  • She’s Just Not That Into You (or Your Smelly Car)
  • Trash, Recycling, or Compost? Who Gives a Shit, Just Throw It Away!  

But it wasn’t!  My metamorphosis came not from Good Housekeeping, but from good writing: the classic American guide to crafting a sentence — Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style.  

How?  Think about the book’s most famous wisdom: “Omit needless words,” which I’d been chanting to myself since high school.  Long before I’d begun tossing unneeded socks, I’d been tossing unneeded words — an enthusiastic (if not always observant) trimmer of tangled sentences.  E.B. White’s advice came easily to me; somewhere deep down I love getting rid of stuff.  If I’d been a different sort of man, I might have been one of those Donald Trump- or Michelle-Rhee-like bosses whose idea of a fun time is to get drunk and lay off whole floors of his workforce.  I always had little trouble throwing stuff out.  There went the old pair of shoes, there went the threadbare hat, there went the “philosopher jacket” (as my friends called it because I’d worn it so broodingly around campus) that had enveloped me during a decade of my most formidable memories, now more duct tape than coat.  If it hadn’t been used in a  year, I’d do what I’d always done with extra nouns and verbs: toss it.  Paring a thing to its essentials — a written essay, a company, or perhaps even a clothes closet — had always seemed both clarifying and liberating.  That which fails to weigh us down makes us only stronger.  I never had trouble unburdening myself once I got around to it.  Trouble was, I rarely did.

The change happened slowly.  What I know is this: it was motivated by fear.  Fear at first that I would lose my class’s attention if I wasn’t well planned, and never get it back.  Then a fear that if I did not plan out my classes carefully, my students would depart into the world with the literacy skills of adolescent water buffalo.

At first this fear burned itself off in fanatically detailed lesson plans, the type of things that are planned out to the minute.  I’d even write it all out on the overhead PowerPoint in comically didactic steps:

  • “Next you will pick up the pencil with your right hand . . . ”
  • “You will hold it between your thumb and forefinger . . .”
  • “You will resist the urge to throw spitballs at the new kid . . . ”

It got so bad that my coworkers were teasing me.  They asked me if I wrote out minute-by-minute schedules like that for my wife at home.  Of course not, I assured them, the schedules I write for her are only hourly.  (“12 pm: get indignant about husband’s blog post.”)

Soon I began whipping the physical space of the classroom itself into organized shape.  Again, it was fear: on a paper-strewn desk I’d all-too-easily misplace my plans, leading to horrifying dead-air time, leading to the inevitable flurry of misbehaviors.  My mental thought process went something like this: “If I don’t keep things straight around here, I’ll lose my plans.  If I lose my plans, I won’t have anything for kids to do.  And if I don’t have anything for kids to do . . .  they might start SEXTING!”

At some point I looked around and realized I was more organized than not.

I wasn’t the only one.  Public school teaching is a humbling profession, and I began to look around in meetings to see that I wasn’t the only one fondling his planner like a beloved stuffed animal.  There are plenty of teachers who swagger in and spend Year 1 trying to “go with the flow,” or “following where the students lead.” Those teachers usually spend Year 2 applying to law schools.  Being up against 100 adolescents every day makes even the most ardent improviser look for a nice, wide, well-marked path to follow.

But it wasn’t until maybe a year ago that I took things a little too far.  By then I had things humming.  Work was methodically collected, shunted off into labeled folders, graded and entered into the gradebook according to a set priority during set times, and distributed back to the student, all with mechanical precision.  Worksheets were printed a day ahead of time, organized in a special place, distributed, then any extras saved according to a strict “Noah’s Arc” policy: keep two of each kind, then send the rest to the bottom of the bin.  Student absences — the bane of any organized teacher’s existence — were hardly an issue.  If a student missed a quiz, his name was immediately slapped on a blank copy in hard, red ink and shuttled off to a special place where he knew to pick it up on his return.  Late assignments were accepted within a week and no longer.  In time I put all assignments on Google Classroom for absent students to make up.  After a time, it was like clockwork.

Even my time was brutally organized.  Where once I’d lounged around with my feet up, drinking coffee and talking to students who wandered in, now if anyone came into my room in the breaks between classes, or even during lunchtime or after school, I’d look at him like I were a highly efficient Swiss rail conductor and he a herd of cattle that had stopped on the tracks.  I suddenly realized that I was becoming too organized.

The problem is, being too organized can turn you to stone, can cause you to look askance at real, live human interaction — so unpredictable and noisy compared the surgical precision of a well-executed teaching plan.  Instead of pausing to linger in the doorway to talk with students about the Warriors, about their driver’s tests, or about how their older brother was doing in college, I was busy routing their homework into the appropriate bin, or goading them to find their seats so we wouldn’t waste time.  During free periods students would wander in — ostensibly to ask about the details of some assignment, but really because they wanted attention, wanted to be heard by another human being.  Yes, I wasn’t bringing home extra work on the weekends, but was I missing out something better — the kind of beautiful, unscripted moments with children that inspired me to teach in the first place?

So that’s why I’ve been trying to scale it back this year.  I’ve told myself: there’s no need to have *every* minute planned.  Because human beings are messy, and sometimes what you really need to adapt to this is a kind of studied messiness.  It’s good to have a plan, but just like in whitewater paddling, you have to be prepared to amend that plan.  I’m not talking about going back to winging it like I did my first year.  I’m talking about an even deeper, more audacious kind of organization: planning things out so well that you’ve built in some time to be bothered — some time to react to life as it comes at you in all of its wonderfully unpredictable swells.  Time for people, time for listening, and, yes, a time for going with the flow.  

The unplanned stuff — that should all be part of your plan.

Very Disappointed

Sometimes you don’t realize you’ve been played until much later — especially if you’ve been played by a veteran.

This turned out to be the case last week, although I didn’t realize it at the time, when my wife confronted me with what sounded like a perfectly reasonable request.

“Alden,” she said, “I’d really like it if you’d read this book and then we could talk about it together.”

I should have realized that something was up when she used my full name.  Normally my wife calls me by my initials, A.B.B.  Someone once misheard her and thought she was calling me “A.D.D.” — as in “Attention Deficit Disorder.” That’s sort of like saying, “Hey, I.B.S.!  Yeah, you, Irritiable Bowel Syndrome!  Can you pass the remote?”

The use of my full first name is normally reserved for Major Infractions, the kind for which I usually end up performing some act of domestic penance, like committing to large-scale vacuuming projects.  I can’t tell what’s worse about the full-name technique: its devastating effectiveness, or fact that my wife learned it from me.

For years I’d regaled her with battlefield stories of how I, a high school teacher, have employed the full-name technique to great effect on unsuspecting teenagers.  When I first started teaching, I knew I needed an identity, a way to respond when I wanted to motivate students.  Unfortunately, most of the obvious ones didn’t fit.  I’m not a Bobby Knight-style yeller; I don’t throw tantrums (or chairs).  For a while I tried cultivating a “speak softly but carry a big stick” persona — sort of like Joe Pesci’s character at the end of “A Bronx Tale” — the gangster who barely has to whisper to communicate how dangerous he is.  Unfortunately I suffered from something of a credibility gap.  While it’s completely terrifying to hear something completely innocuous whispered in your ear — provided it’s done by an unhinged gangster, such as, “You might want to start picking up your socks . . . ” (because you know that if you don’t, he’ll kill you and your neighbors and your neighbors’ pets), it’s somewhat less intimidating coming from a guy wearing an Oxford shirt who drives a minivan, when he whispers, “If you don’t do your homework, you may end up with a C- this semester.” Just a different effect.

I tried on other teaching personas:  the “I’m just trying to help you” guy (had no effect), the groovy “everybody just chill out, man, and let yourself, like, feel feelings” guy (led to speculations about my drug use), and finally, the highly-exasperated, “I might quit teaching at any moment because of you kids!” guy (actually seemed to encourage them).  None of it worked.

That’s when I found the answer: disappointment!  No kid, deep down, wants to let down his parents, so I figured — why don’t I channel some of that?  Why can’t I make telling me they forgot their homework feel like they have to tell dad they accidentally wore his favorite suede jacket as a raincoat?  I even stumbled upon the perfect model in the character of Lester Freamon, the savvy, wizened detective in the crime series “The Wire.” None of the young detectives in his unit ever wanted to disappoint Freamon, mostly because 1) he was the most badass, genius criminal investigator since Porfiry Petrovich, and because 2) they knew if they did come back without the goods, Freamon would give them a disappointed, fatherly look over the top of his reading glasses and make them feel like complete failures.  This act was so effective that it became a running joke on the show.

If you were homicide detective in Baltimore, you didn’t want to disappoint Lester Freamon.

Very soon, bolstered by a few years’ teaching experience, and by some jots of grey in my beard, I started emulating Freamon and sending severe looks of my own across the top of my perfectly imaginary reading glasses.  I’ve even considered buying a fake pair just to enhance the effect.  I also began to approximate Freamon’s wise, all-knowing tone — which I carried a step further by always using a student’s full name (just as his parents might).

“Christopher Jonathan Snutterson,” I’ll say slowly to some poor junior — most of whose friends have never heard his full name, preferring something shorthand and sensitive, such as “Snut-bag.”

“May I speak with you a moment — outside?”

By the time I get this young man outside the classroom (“public praise, private reprimand” is the educational catchphrase), and deliver the next line, it’s all over:

“Young man, I am disappointed.”

I’m not angry (which is often a shortcut to shutting down the adolescent brain) — just let down, which sometimes doesn’t register, but sometimes stirs something primal — and I play it to the hilt (and in some sense, of course, I really am let down).  I tend to use this approach almost exclusively on young males, with whom the paternal subtext is particularly effective: “Young man, as a self-appointed father figure in this particular situation, I expected a lot more from you.” Sometimes it doesn’t work, but often it does.  My greatest reward came last fall when one mother told me that her son’s grades had improved dramatically simply because he’d been too guilty to disappoint me.

I rarely use this technique with girls.  (But then again, girls never call each other “Snut-bag,” do they?  They just make catty comments under their breath like, “Do you really think you’ve got the boobs for that dress?”)

So imagine my frustration when I realized that the Lester Freamon technique was just as effective when turned back on its creator — me!  In fact, my wife has gotten quite good at it, although the subtext is somewhat different.  “Alden Bancroft Bird,” she seems to say, “I’m your wife and I make your sandwiches and don’t you love me?” It’s less about disappointment, and more about eliciting sympathy.  It’s completely unfair.  Plus, I’m powerless to use it back on her.  The same look that projects “fatherly” and “benevolent” to misbehaving but desperate-to-please teenage boys comes off more as “paternalistic” or “condescending as hell” to the women’s-college-educated demographic.

Not to mention that my wife is capable of a sort of Jedi mind trick that instantly causes any semblance of moral authority I have to vanish.  We’ll be taking a casual stroll at Sea World when she will suddenly do something that would seem to give me an overwhelming upper hand — say, knocking me into a tank full of live sharks.  There is thrashing, and crimson water.  Finally park officials hoist out the remains of a man who is basically okay, but missing jaw-shaped chunks of his body.  You would think I’d be untouchable at this point, but then she’d give me that look (my look!) which says: “You’d better not make a big a deal out of this, or, god forbid, make a face.  If you do, have fun recovering from blood loss in your new bachelor apartment.”

But what about the book, you ask?  The one my wife had strongly suggested I read and then we discuss?

The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up.  

Need I say more?

 

Postscript:

This post is dedicated to my friend and coworker Laure Angel, an outrageously good educator and human being who never needed a gimmick or “look” to bring out the best in her students.